Should FIDE have a Super-GM title for 2700+ GMs?

To achieve the Grandmaster title in chess, you have to perform exceptionally in 3 very strong tournaments and you must obtain a FIDE rating of 2500 to be awarded the title. In the early and mid-20th century it was much more difficult to become a Grandmaster because there were far less tournaments and ratings were much lower. However, in the 21st century it is much easier to attain the GM title as strong tournaments are much more frequent and the FIDE rating system has experienced substantial inflation. Let´s look at the numbers: in 1972 there were 88 GMs and in 2012 there are now over 1200 GMs! However the vast majority (around 95%) of Grandmasters are rated between 2400 and 2699 FIDE. After the recent Chess Olympiad 2012 in Istanbul, there are now a total of 50 Super-GMs rated over 2700 FIDE.

Why Not Distinguish The Super-GMs?

Fischer - Super-GM
Fischer
Not only has the culture of chess changed incredibly over the last 50-100 years, the ratings are different now as well! Bobby Fischer hit his peak rating of 2785 back in 1972, placing him far and above his contemporaries. Now 2785 FIDE would put you at #5 in the world – still impressive but not exactly at clear world dominance status. In 1989 Nigel Short was rated 2650 and came in at #3 in the world – in today´s market he wouldn´t even make the cut for the top 100! So how to explain the differences in the rating system of 20 and 50 years ago with that of today? Without delving into sample populations growing and standard deviations becoming more extreme, the easy answer is that there are a LOT more people playing chess today so naturally a LOT more higher-rated players will emerge. But I don´t think that means the top players deserve less recognition. To achieve 2700+ means you are a legitimate contender for the world championship, that you dominate ALL other lesser Grandmasters and titled players in any event you play. It only seems natural that such fantastically talented players receive an official title of recognition – the Super-Grandmaster!

3 comments on “Should FIDE have a Super-GM title for 2700+ GMs?

  1. Joe frabjel says:

    I think it is a bad idea. Why not have even more titles then one for 2500 and one for 2600 and one for 2700 and so on. The point is if you become a GM then you are officially a strong player who should be respected in the chess world. No reason to have a super GM title for the few at the top. A super GM and a GM can still play challenging and complex games and a super GM can still lose in rapid or blitz. I don’t think carlsen and and nepo and mvl etc wish they had another title to separate them from the “normal grandmaster” they know they are at the top they don’t care. Lastly, it pushes the gap between GMs and super GMs further, this is bad for chess culture. A “normal GM” should still be given the respect to play super GMs. Also if in the future we have 3000+ then should we have the SUPER Duper Grandmaster? The point GM title is that now you are officially someone who plays top level chess. If anything maybe we should just raise the rating standard for GM if you think these normal GMs arent good enough.

  2. Richie says:

    Excellent post William! 🙂 Titles do mean a lot in the chess world. And if GM doesn’t distill the cream from the crop (is that a contamination of expressions?) then perhaps it’s time to change that.
    On a somewhat related note, as you say there’s been rating inflation: how achievable, given a determined and hard working relatively young person do you think reaching expert level is?

    Thanks for all the hard work and excellent videos (also by GM Henley).

    1. William says:

      Thanks Richie. I think the cream from the crop expression works there. I think any reasonably hard-working player can achieve expert. It is not that easy but if you have a good game plan and work hard then it is perfectly doable. Thanks for checking out our site and commenting. I´d be glad to send you a 50% off coupon for all digital items in our store – if you´re interested then send me an email at [email protected] and I will shoot over your coupon code. Cheers, Will

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share

3 comments on “Should FIDE have a Super-GM title for 2700+ GMs?

  1. Joe frabjel says:

    I think it is a bad idea. Why not have even more titles then one for 2500 and one for 2600 and one for 2700 and so on. The point is if you become a GM then you are officially a strong player who should be respected in the chess world. No reason to have a super GM title for the few at the top. A super GM and a GM can still play challenging and complex games and a super GM can still lose in rapid or blitz. I don’t think carlsen and and nepo and mvl etc wish they had another title to separate them from the “normal grandmaster” they know they are at the top they don’t care. Lastly, it pushes the gap between GMs and super GMs further, this is bad for chess culture. A “normal GM” should still be given the respect to play super GMs. Also if in the future we have 3000+ then should we have the SUPER Duper Grandmaster? The point GM title is that now you are officially someone who plays top level chess. If anything maybe we should just raise the rating standard for GM if you think these normal GMs arent good enough.

  2. Richie says:

    Excellent post William! 🙂 Titles do mean a lot in the chess world. And if GM doesn’t distill the cream from the crop (is that a contamination of expressions?) then perhaps it’s time to change that.
    On a somewhat related note, as you say there’s been rating inflation: how achievable, given a determined and hard working relatively young person do you think reaching expert level is?

    Thanks for all the hard work and excellent videos (also by GM Henley).

    1. William says:

      Thanks Richie. I think the cream from the crop expression works there. I think any reasonably hard-working player can achieve expert. It is not that easy but if you have a good game plan and work hard then it is perfectly doable. Thanks for checking out our site and commenting. I´d be glad to send you a 50% off coupon for all digital items in our store – if you´re interested then send me an email at [email protected] and I will shoot over your coupon code. Cheers, Will

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

×
×